Vahram Atanesyan, a former member of the Central Committee of Armenia and the Artsakh National Assembly, wrote on his Facebook page.
"From these specific frameworks, you write that Armenia is the guarantor of Artsakh's security with the Declaration of Independence and the constitution; what do you want to say? What do you suggest to Aliyev, or why do you repeat it to him first? Secondly, let's assume that the first president "saw Nagorno-Karabakh as a part of Azerbaijan" and organized the 1995 constitutional referendum and the National Assembly elections only on the territory of the Republic of Armenia. Why did the successors follow that "bad example"? Thirdly, after the April four-day meeting, the issue of signing an Armenia-NKR military mutual assistance agreement was discussed very seriously; some even assured that the deal was ready and would be signed here and there, so what happened?
At that time, wasn't Armenia the guarantor of Artsakh's security? Now, as Karabagh says, after the fact, you are talking about the Pan-Armenian agenda. Why? Because Aliyev says: Are there revanchist forces in Armenia? After all, even the hunter doesn't tell anyone about it before hunting; what have you done to your dogs? For two years, you called any dialogue between Stepanakert and Baku "betrayal." What did we end up with?
